<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the Internet Make Grammar Obsolete?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/</link>
	<description>Usability &#38; User Experience (UX) Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Wow</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Wow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1395#comment-998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear, hear! I support you all the way in your quest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear! I support you all the way in your quest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Shooner</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Shooner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1395#comment-826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author keeps referring to &#039;good grammar&#039; as though it&#039;s some kind of immutable constant. In linguistics, a &#039;good grammar&#039; is one that works.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author keeps referring to &#8216;good grammar&#8217; as though it&#8217;s some kind of immutable constant. In linguistics, a &#8216;good grammar&#8217; is one that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eamnita</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Eamnita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1395#comment-719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose the main reason grammar remains important is the assumption that if people are careless in the way they write, then they are also careless in what they write. If you read the other comments regarding this article, there are a number of mistakes; on one hand it doesn&#039;t mean that what people say is invalidated, on the other it&#039;s a little strange, especially regarding this topic, people don&#039;t check.

I think the problem lies in the fact that, in truth, writing well is not at all easy but given the number of blogs, tweets, celebrity ghost novels etc. everyone thinks they can do it.
20 years ago when Pagemaker came out everyone though they were layout artists, Photoshop made them graphic designers and now twitter makes them authors.

Wow, I sound like my dad!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the main reason grammar remains important is the assumption that if people are careless in the way they write, then they are also careless in what they write. If you read the other comments regarding this article, there are a number of mistakes; on one hand it doesn&#8217;t mean that what people say is invalidated, on the other it&#8217;s a little strange, especially regarding this topic, people don&#8217;t check.</p>
<p>I think the problem lies in the fact that, in truth, writing well is not at all easy but given the number of blogs, tweets, celebrity ghost novels etc. everyone thinks they can do it.<br />
20 years ago when Pagemaker came out everyone though they were layout artists, Photoshop made them graphic designers and now twitter makes them authors.</p>
<p>Wow, I sound like my dad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tesmond</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Tesmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1395#comment-713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect the internet is actually dramatically improving grammer. It is of course difficult to measure improvements in relative levels of grammer, unless you have full access to Google or Facebook cache to run the appropriate queries. 

Grammer&#039;s primary purpose is to remove ambiguity from communication, and with more people using written communication rather than verbal it is likely that grammer has improved significantly.  Verbal communication has the advantage of never having spelling mistakes, and gestures and tone can aid the understanding of poor sentence structure or use of language.  Text communication requires stricter adherence to grammatical rules to achieve a similar level of understanding.

Perhaps comparing the number of grammatical errors a 1980s Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia would provide an interesting insight into the development of grammer and spelling in the &quot;internet age&quot;.   

As an aside many great authors throughout history have used abbreviation, abbreviation is not a sign of a reduction in the quality of communication, it is more likely to do with a limitation of the communication medium. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect the internet is actually dramatically improving grammer. It is of course difficult to measure improvements in relative levels of grammer, unless you have full access to Google or Facebook cache to run the appropriate queries. </p>
<p>Grammer&#8217;s primary purpose is to remove ambiguity from communication, and with more people using written communication rather than verbal it is likely that grammer has improved significantly.  Verbal communication has the advantage of never having spelling mistakes, and gestures and tone can aid the understanding of poor sentence structure or use of language.  Text communication requires stricter adherence to grammatical rules to achieve a similar level of understanding.</p>
<p>Perhaps comparing the number of grammatical errors a 1980s Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia would provide an interesting insight into the development of grammer and spelling in the &#8220;internet age&#8221;.   </p>
<p>As an aside many great authors throughout history have used abbreviation, abbreviation is not a sign of a reduction in the quality of communication, it is more likely to do with a limitation of the communication medium. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Aric Hall</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Aric Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1395#comment-689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been working my way through &quot;The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood&quot; by James Gleick. There is some interesting discussion about spelling, grammar and the first dictionaries that are somewhat relevant to your post. The gist of it is that the art of communication is a living, breathing and continuously evolving beast.

Most of the examples you site seem to come from social media. It&#039;s important to note that many of these communications you sited are very casual. Social media in particular is geared toward short expressions as opposed to long discourses. Take twitter for example. The 140 Character limit makes brevity a necessity. In these cases we often write like we talk in casual conversations. We often use slang or euphemisms when chatting up friends. Now, I&#039;m not making excuses for poor grammar, but I do believe that context is important.

I agree that grammar will continue to be important. As for the case of the newspaper article, clearly this was laziness on the part of the writer and editor (I assume this was a college newspaper?). They clearly did not take the time to review, edit and research proper format before publishing the article. This brings up another interesting discussion...the ease of self-publishing. 

Just about anyone can publish themselves anytime, anywhere. The prolificness of blogs, smartphones and social media makes it simple and fast. That means the amount of content that is available at our fingertips is growing exponentially everyday. Most of these new publishers don&#039;t hold to the rigorous editorial standards of traditional publishers. Hence, more public examples of poor grammar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working my way through &#8220;The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood&#8221; by James Gleick. There is some interesting discussion about spelling, grammar and the first dictionaries that are somewhat relevant to your post. The gist of it is that the art of communication is a living, breathing and continuously evolving beast.</p>
<p>Most of the examples you site seem to come from social media. It&#8217;s important to note that many of these communications you sited are very casual. Social media in particular is geared toward short expressions as opposed to long discourses. Take twitter for example. The 140 Character limit makes brevity a necessity. In these cases we often write like we talk in casual conversations. We often use slang or euphemisms when chatting up friends. Now, I&#8217;m not making excuses for poor grammar, but I do believe that context is important.</p>
<p>I agree that grammar will continue to be important. As for the case of the newspaper article, clearly this was laziness on the part of the writer and editor (I assume this was a college newspaper?). They clearly did not take the time to review, edit and research proper format before publishing the article. This brings up another interesting discussion&#8230;the ease of self-publishing. </p>
<p>Just about anyone can publish themselves anytime, anywhere. The prolificness of blogs, smartphones and social media makes it simple and fast. That means the amount of content that is available at our fingertips is growing exponentially everyday. Most of these new publishers don&#8217;t hold to the rigorous editorial standards of traditional publishers. Hence, more public examples of poor grammar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melinda</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Melinda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1395#comment-687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t believe it is just a matter of education.  The teachers in my area have stated that any student using text grammar in a paper will receive an automatic F.  Parents have to be involved as well.  I always correct my kids on the correct spelling or correct meaning of word.  They hate it and it drives them nuts.  However, they are now correcting me when I use a word inappropriately.

There are appropriate places to use text grammar such as social media sites and text messaging.  Then there are places where you should not use text grammar such as academic papers.  Blogging is a whole different form of media.  The blog page depends on who or what you are representing.  If the page is just for family and friends, then I see nothing wrong with using text grammar.  However, if you are representing your company or you are a writer, then text grammar should be thrown out the window.

There are two questions you should ask yourself before writing anything.  First, who am I representing in this document?  Second, who is my targeted audience?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe it is just a matter of education.  The teachers in my area have stated that any student using text grammar in a paper will receive an automatic F.  Parents have to be involved as well.  I always correct my kids on the correct spelling or correct meaning of word.  They hate it and it drives them nuts.  However, they are now correcting me when I use a word inappropriately.</p>
<p>There are appropriate places to use text grammar such as social media sites and text messaging.  Then there are places where you should not use text grammar such as academic papers.  Blogging is a whole different form of media.  The blog page depends on who or what you are representing.  If the page is just for family and friends, then I see nothing wrong with using text grammar.  However, if you are representing your company or you are a writer, then text grammar should be thrown out the window.</p>
<p>There are two questions you should ask yourself before writing anything.  First, who am I representing in this document?  Second, who is my targeted audience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoby Van Hoose</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/will-the-internet-make-grammar-obsolete/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoby Van Hoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1395#comment-685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the reason we&#039;re seeing so much bad grammar around has to do with the Internet&#039;s ability to display the writing capability of more &#039;americans&#039; than any previous technology. It also isn&#039;t helped by a growing majority of text being input by mobile phone 9-key entry—but I think the main culprit that the web exposes, is the ongoing deterioration of K-12 education.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason we&#8217;re seeing so much bad grammar around has to do with the Internet&#8217;s ability to display the writing capability of more &#8216;americans&#8217; than any previous technology. It also isn&#8217;t helped by a growing majority of text being input by mobile phone 9-key entry—but I think the main culprit that the web exposes, is the ongoing deterioration of K-12 education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 24/32 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk

 Served from: usabilitygeek.com @ 2013-05-26 07:57:33 by W3 Total Cache -->