<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website Image Usability and SEO Best Practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/</link>
	<description>Usability &#38; User Experience (UX) Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kizi friv</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>kizi friv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-1298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of the best articles Ive ever read. Youve got some mad skill here, man. I just hope that you dont lose your style because youre definitely one of the coolest authors out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best articles Ive ever read. Youve got some mad skill here, man. I just hope that you dont lose your style because youre definitely one of the coolest authors out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usability, SEO And The Modern Day Internet Marketing Professional &#124; Usability GeekUsability Geek</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Usability, SEO And The Modern Day Internet Marketing Professional &#124; Usability GeekUsability Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-1183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for example images. With Google’s blended search, where image, video and content appear on the same SERP, images [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for example images. With Google’s blended search, where image, video and content appear on the same SERP, images [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Sholer</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Sholer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article. Often I meet people who do not know how to use the back button, nor  how to choose to open a new tab. The computer knowledge level of your reader might determine which option to use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. Often I meet people who do not know how to use the back button, nor  how to choose to open a new tab. The computer knowledge level of your reader might determine which option to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Luke,

I guess as the saying goes &quot;we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree&quot; at this point.

Opening new windows is nothing malicious or contentious to me, it is a practice to allow the user to see the link you want, while also staying on the same page/place as they were before without having to pres the &quot;back&quot; button on their browser.

It&#039;s convenience, nothing more.

Capital Letters For A Sentence Just Looks Better.

It&#039;s why it is a best practice for virtually all ads (AdWords, LinkedIn, et. al), but again, that&#039;s your own preference.

It&#039;s good to discuss this and have an open dialogue about it, so thanks for that again!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Luke,</p>
<p>I guess as the saying goes &#8220;we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree&#8221; at this point.</p>
<p>Opening new windows is nothing malicious or contentious to me, it is a practice to allow the user to see the link you want, while also staying on the same page/place as they were before without having to pres the &#8220;back&#8221; button on their browser.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s convenience, nothing more.</p>
<p>Capital Letters For A Sentence Just Looks Better.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s why it is a best practice for virtually all ads (AdWords, LinkedIn, et. al), but again, that&#8217;s your own preference.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to discuss this and have an open dialogue about it, so thanks for that again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke McGrath</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris, I can&#039;t agree with you here.  By opening new tabs you are not &quot;allowing this option&quot; for users, you are forcing the option. As you say, users can open links in new tabs by holding control when clicking on a link. Saying this is &quot;usability best practice&quot; is not evidence, it is incorrect.

Please see this page: &#039;Opening new windows and tabs from a link only when necessary&#039;: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G200.html 

which states: &quot; In general,  it is better not to open new windows and tabs since they 
can be  disorienting for people, especially people who have difficulty  
perceiving visual content&quot;.

As for capital letters, it is not a case of ease of scanning or cleanliness it is readability. Users expect sentences to conform to grammatical norms, more so when the user in question is cognitively disabled. Reading ease is vital for many disabled (and regular) users and should not be contorted. 

I don&#039;t agree with your approach to titles but will conceed that it is a much more contentious area. The others, I believe, are wrong.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I can&#8217;t agree with you here.  By opening new tabs you are not &#8220;allowing this option&#8221; for users, you are forcing the option. As you say, users can open links in new tabs by holding control when clicking on a link. Saying this is &#8220;usability best practice&#8221; is not evidence, it is incorrect.</p>
<p>Please see this page: &#8216;Opening new windows and tabs from a link only when necessary&#8217;: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G200.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G200.html</a> </p>
<p>which states: &#8221; In general,  it is better not to open new windows and tabs since they<br />
can be  disorienting for people, especially people who have difficulty<br />
perceiving visual content&#8221;.</p>
<p>As for capital letters, it is not a case of ease of scanning or cleanliness it is readability. Users expect sentences to conform to grammatical norms, more so when the user in question is cognitively disabled. Reading ease is vital for many disabled (and regular) users and should not be contorted. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with your approach to titles but will conceed that it is a much more contentious area. The others, I believe, are wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi Luke -- regarding the &quot;holding hostage&quot; and analytics reasons for opening a new window, I explained myself in the above comment.

As to the Capital Letters -- this is a personal preference, and something that I have found is more elegant, and clean than lower case.

The Upper Case allows someone to scan the text more easily and glean what it is about as opposed to making it like regular text.

Again, this is not set in stone, please feel free to do as you like on your own or client&#039;s websites, but for a cleaner aesthetic this is something I much prefer, especially when mousing over an image.

Finally, regarding titles, they do not hurt and only take an extra 10 seconds to create and could add value to both the user and search engines.

There is no harm in creating them, and the slight chance that they help with SEO -- and more than likely, user appreciation for explaining the image, where the images is about to go (if I click on it) and other considerations.

Again, thanks for the discussion and bringing up some awesome points!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hi Luke &#8212; regarding the &#8220;holding hostage&#8221; and analytics reasons for opening a new window, I explained myself in the above comment.</p>
<p>As to the Capital Letters &#8212; this is a personal preference, and something that I have found is more elegant, and clean than lower case.</p>
<p>The Upper Case allows someone to scan the text more easily and glean what it is about as opposed to making it like regular text.</p>
<p>Again, this is not set in stone, please feel free to do as you like on your own or client&#8217;s websites, but for a cleaner aesthetic this is something I much prefer, especially when mousing over an image.</p>
<p>Finally, regarding titles, they do not hurt and only take an extra 10 seconds to create and could add value to both the user and search engines.</p>
<p>There is no harm in creating them, and the slight chance that they help with SEO &#8212; and more than likely, user appreciation for explaining the image, where the images is about to go (if I click on it) and other considerations.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the discussion and bringing up some awesome points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hello @jholmberg:disqus  Thanks for the feedback, and I enjoy hearing other perspectives.

I think that as users we see things differently -- and especially as business owners.

Whenever I surf the web and there are imbedded links in a post that I want to continue reading, I want nothing more than to open those links in either new tabs and/or a new window as I want to continue my place on the current page and keep reading the post I was originally reading.

As such, for usability, allowing the user this option -- opening in a new window automatically for convenience or they can press the &quot;control&quot; or other button to get it to open in a new tab themselves -- allows for fluidity and doesn&#039;t break the reading experience.

Others may disagree, but this is my experience and usability best practice, but I again thank you for bringing another viewpoint to the discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hello @jholmberg:disqus  Thanks for the feedback, and I enjoy hearing other perspectives.</p>
<p>I think that as users we see things differently &#8212; and especially as business owners.</p>
<p>Whenever I surf the web and there are imbedded links in a post that I want to continue reading, I want nothing more than to open those links in either new tabs and/or a new window as I want to continue my place on the current page and keep reading the post I was originally reading.</p>
<p>As such, for usability, allowing the user this option &#8212; opening in a new window automatically for convenience or they can press the &#8220;control&#8221; or other button to get it to open in a new tab themselves &#8212; allows for fluidity and doesn&#8217;t break the reading experience.</p>
<p>Others may disagree, but this is my experience and usability best practice, but I again thank you for bringing another viewpoint to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke McGrath</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a few issue with this advice, most importantly the suggestion to open in a new window - open in the same window, that&#039;s what the back button is for. Holding on to a user who doesn&#039;t want to be on your site any longer just artificially inflates your &quot;time on site&quot; analytics. Above that, it&#039;s bad usability, as @jholmberg:disqus says.

Could you explain why you suggest Capital Letters For Alt And Title? I&#039;ve never heard that before. I can&#039;t see how this helps, it just makes the sentence harder to read - nigh on impossible for someone with reading difficulites. 

Lastly, titles. They&#039;re so poorly supported across browsers that a wise lady once said to me: &quot;If you wan&#039;t something to be accessible, don&#039;t put in in a title attribute.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a few issue with this advice, most importantly the suggestion to open in a new window &#8211; open in the same window, that&#8217;s what the back button is for. Holding on to a user who doesn&#8217;t want to be on your site any longer just artificially inflates your &#8220;time on site&#8221; analytics. Above that, it&#8217;s bad usability, as @jholmberg:disqus says.</p>
<p>Could you explain why you suggest Capital Letters For Alt And Title? I&#8217;ve never heard that before. I can&#8217;t see how this helps, it just makes the sentence harder to read &#8211; nigh on impossible for someone with reading difficulites. </p>
<p>Lastly, titles. They&#8217;re so poorly supported across browsers that a wise lady once said to me: &#8220;If you wan&#8217;t something to be accessible, don&#8217;t put in in a title attribute.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johannes Holmberg</title>
		<link>http://usabilitygeek.com/website-image-usability-and-seo-best-practices/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Johannes Holmberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usabilitygeek.com/?p=1869#comment-785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of good advices here but I don&#039;t agree at all that the link should open in a new window if the URL points to a different site. That is bad usability. It&#039;s not up to the creator of a website to decide if a link should open in a new window or not. It&#039;s up to the user. This is just a bad and old way to desperately try to hang onto the user. I always, always, always expect the links I&#039;m clicking to open in the same tab. I&#039;m so frustrated every time it doesn&#039;t and breaks the standard behavior of the back button. Stop breaking the web. Please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of good advices here but I don&#8217;t agree at all that the link should open in a new window if the URL points to a different site. That is bad usability. It&#8217;s not up to the creator of a website to decide if a link should open in a new window or not. It&#8217;s up to the user. This is just a bad and old way to desperately try to hang onto the user. I always, always, always expect the links I&#8217;m clicking to open in the same tab. I&#8217;m so frustrated every time it doesn&#8217;t and breaks the standard behavior of the back button. Stop breaking the web. Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 24/32 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk

 Served from: usabilitygeek.com @ 2013-06-19 01:39:12 by W3 Total Cache -->